The U.N. decisions to partition Palestine and then to grant admission
to the state of Israel were made, on one level, as an emotional response
to the horrors of the Holocaust, Under more normal circumstances, the compelling
claims to sovereignty of the Arab majority would have prevailed. This reaction
of guilt on the part of the Western allies was understandable, but that
doesn't mean the Palestinians should have to pay for crimes committed by
others -- a classic example of two wrongs not making a right.
The Holocaust is often used as the final argument in favor of Zionism,
but is this connection justified? There are several aspects to consider
in answering that question honestly. First, we will examine the historical
record of what the Zionist movement actually did to help save European
Jewry from the Nazis.
Shamir proposes an alliance with the Nazis
"As late as 1941, the Zionist group LEHI, one of whose leaders,
Yitzhak Shamir, was later to become a prime minister of Israel, approached
the Nazis, using the name of its parent organization, the Irgun(NMO)..[The
proposal stated:] 'The establishment of the historical Jewish state on
a national and totalitarian Pd bound by a treaty with the German Reich
would be in the interests of strengthening the future German nation of
power in the Near East...The NMO in Palestine offers to take an active
part in the war on Germany's side'...The Nazis rejected this proposal for
an alliance because, it is reported, they considered LEHI's military power
'negligible.' " Allan Brownfield in "The Washington Report
on Middle Eastern Affairs", July/August 1998.
Wasn't the main goal of Zionism to save Jews from the Holocaust?
"In 1938 a thirty-one nation conference was held in Evian, France,
on resettlement of the victims of Nazism. The World Zionist Organization
refused to participate, fearing that resettlement of Jews in other states
would reduce the number available for Palestine." John Quigley,
"Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice."
Main goal of Zionism - continued
"It was summed up in the meeting [of the Jewish Agency's Executive
on June 26, 1938] that the Zionist thing to do 'is belittle the [Evian]
Conference as far as possible and to cause it to decide nothing...We are
particularly worried that it would move Jewish organizations to collect
large sums of money for aid to Jewish refugees, and these collections could
interfere with our collection efforts'...Ben-Gurion's statement at the
same meeting: 'No rationalization can turn the conference from a harmful
to a useful one. What can and should be done is to limit the damage as
far as possible.'" Israeli author Boas Evron, "Jewish State
or Israeli Nation?"
Main goal of Zionism - continued
"[Ben-Gurion stated] 'If I knew that it was possible to save all
the children of Germany by transporting them to England, but only half
of them by transporting them to Palestine, I would choose the second -
because we face not only the reckoning of those children, but the historical
reckoning of the Jewish people.' In the wake of the Kristallnacht pogroms,
Ben-Gurion commented that 'the human conscience' might bring various countries
to open their doors to Jewish refugees from Germany. He saw this as a threat
and warned: 'Zionism is in danger.'" Israeli historian, Tom Segev,
"The Seventh Million."
Main goal of Zionism-continued
"Even David Ben-Gurion's sympathetic biographer acknowledges that
Ben-Gurion did nothing practical for rescue, devoting his energies to post-war
prospects. He delegated rescue work to Yitzak Gruenbaum, who [stated]...'They
will say that I am anti-Semitic, that I don't want to save the Exile, that
I don't have a varm Yiddish hartz...Let them say what they want.
I will not demand that the Jewish Agency allocate a sum of 300,000 or 100,000
pounds sterling to help European Jewry. And I think that whoever demands
such things is performing an anti-Zionist act.'
"Zionists in America...took the same position. At a May 1943 meeting
of the American Emergency Committee for Zionist Affairs, Nahum Goldmann
argued, 'If a drive is opened against the White Paper (the British policy
of restricting Jewish immigrants to Palestine) the mass meetings of protest
against the murder of European Jewry will have to be dropped. We do not
have sufficient manpower for both campaigns.'" Peter Novick, "The
Holocaust in American Life."
Main goal of Zionism - continued
"The Zionist movement...interfered with and hindered other organizations,
Jewish and non-Jewish, whenever it imagined that their activity, political
or humanitarian, was at variance with Zionist aims or in competition with
them, even when these might be helpful to Jews, even when it was a question
of life and death...Beit Zvi documents the Zionist leadership's indifference
to saving Jews from the Nazi menace except in cases in which the Jews could
be brought to Palestine...[e.g.] the readiness of the dictator of the Dominican
Republic, Rafael Trujillo, to absorb one hundred thousand refugees and
the sabotaging of this idea - as well as others, like proposals to settle
the Jews inAlaska and the Philippines - by the Zionist movement...
"The obtuseness of the Zionist movement toward the fate of European
Jewry did not prevent it, of course, from later hurling accusations against
the whole world for its indifference toward the Jewish catastrophe or from
pressing material, political, and moral demands on the world because of
that indifference." Israeli author Boas Evron, "Jewish State
or Israeli Nation?"
Main goal of Zionism - continued
"I have already gone exhaustively into the reason for our being
here, reasons that I as a pioneer of 1906 can affirm have nothing to do
with the Nazis!...We are here because the land is ours. And we are here
because we have again made it ours in this time with the work we have put
into it. Nazism and our history of martyrdom abroad do not concern our
presence in Israel directly." David Ben-Gurion, "Memoirs."
In hindsight, it is easy to say that the millions of Jews who were murdered
in the Holocaust could have been saved if Palestine had been available
for unlimited immigration. The history of this period is not so simple,
however. First, keep in mind that other realistic resettlement plans were
proposed but actively opposed by the Zionist movement. Second, the great
majority of Jews in Europe were not Zionists and did not try to emigrate
to Palestine before 1939. Third, after the start of the war, as the Nazis
occupied various countries, they refused to let the Jews leave, making
emigration virtually impossible. And Palestine, as we have shown, was already
occupied; the indigenous Arabs had more valid reasons than any other country
for wanting to limit Jewish immigration. Read on:
~ ~ ~ ~
Emigration to Palestine before World War II
"In 1936, the Social Democratic Bund won a sweeping victory in
Jewish kehilla elections in Poland...Its main hallmarks included 'an unyielding
hostility to Zionism' and to the Zionist enterprise of Jewish emigration
from Poland to Palestine. The Bund wished Polish Jews to fight anti-semitism
in Poland by remaining there...The Zionist goal was also opposed, as a
matter of principle, by all the major parties and movements among pre-1939
Polish Jewry..."Elsewhere in eastern Europe...Zionist strength was
weaker still." Prof. William Rubinstein, "The Myth ofRescue."
Emigration to Palestine before World War II - continued
"In fact, Zionism suffered its own defeat in the Holocaust; as
a movement, it failed. It had not, after all, persuaded the majority of
Jews to leave Europe for Palestine while it was still possible to do so."
Israeli historian, Tom Segev, "The Seventh Million."
Emigration during World War II
"[With the start of the war, Nazi] edicts forbidding emigration
followed in all countries under direct Nazi control: after 1940-1 it was
in effect impossible for Jews legally to emigrate from Nazi-occupied Europe
to places of safety...The doors...were firmly shut: by the Nazis, it must
be emphasized." Prof William D. Rubinstein, "The Myth of Rescue.
Palestine was not necessarily a safe haven either
"In September 1940, the Italians, at war with Britain, bombed downtown
Tel Aviv, with over a hundred casualties...As the German Army overran Europe
and North Africa, it appeared possible that it would conquer Palestine
as well. In the summer of 1940, in the spring of 1941, and again in the
fall of 1942 the danger seemed imminent. The yishuv panicked...Many people
tried to find a way out of the country, but it was not easy...Some...were
taking no chances; they carried cyanide capsules." Israeli historian,
Tom Segev, "The Seventh Million."
In any case, Palestine was not Britain's to give away; it was already
occupied.
"We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs,
and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is a Jewish, state here...Jewish
villages were built in the place of Arab villages...There is not a single
community in the country that did not have a former Arab population."
Israeli leader, Moshe Dayan, quoted in Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi's "Original
Sins."
Already occupied, continued
"One can imagine an argument for the right of a persecuted minority
to find refuge in another country able to accommodate it; one is hard-pressed,
however, to imagine an argument for the right of a peaceful minority to
politically and perhaps physically displace the indigenous population of
another country. Yet...the latter was the actual intention of the Zionist
movement." Norman Finkelstein, "Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine
Conflict."
The use of the Holocaust for political gain
"[In 1947] the U.N. appointed a special body, the United Nations
Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP), to make the decision over Palestine
and UNSCOP members were asked to visit the camps of Holocaust survivors.
Many of these survivors wanted to emigrate to the United States, a wish
that undermined the Zionist claims that the fate of European Jewry was
connected to that of the Jewish community in Palestine. When UNSCOP representatives
arrived at the camps, they were unaware that backstage manipulations were
limiting their contacts solely to survivors who wished to emigrate to Palestine,"
Israeli historian, Ilan Pappe in "The Link," January March
1998.
Political gain - continued
"Inside the DP camps, emissaries from the Yishuv organized survivor
activity - crucially, the testimony the DPs gave to the Anglo-American
Committee of Inquiry and the UN Special Committee on Palestine about where
they wished to go...The Jewish Agency envoys reported home that they had
been successful in preventing the appearance of 'undesirable' witnesses
at the hearings. One wrote his girlfiend in Palestine that 'we have to
change our style and handwriting constantly so that they will think that
the questionaires were filled in by the refugees.'"Peter Novick,
"The Holocaust in American Life."
Roosevelt's advisor writes on why Jewish refugees were not offered
sanctuary in the U.S. after WWII
"What if Canada, Australia, South America, England and the United
States were all to open a door to some migration? Even today [written in
1947] it is my judgement, and I have been in Germany since the war, that
only a minority of the Jewish DP's [displaced persons] would choose Palestine...
"[Roosevelt] proposed a world budget for the easy migration of
the 500,000 beaten people of Europe. Each nation should open its doors
for some thousands of refugees...So he suggested that during my trips for
him to England during the war I sound out in a general, unofficial manner
the leaders of British public opinion, in and out of the government...The
simple answer: Great Britain will match the United States, man for man,
in admissions from Europe...It seemed all settled. With the rest of the
world probably ready to give haven to 200,000, there was a sound reason
for the President to press Congress to take in at least 150,000 immigrants
after the war...
"It would free us from the hypocrisy of closing our own doors while
making sanctimonious demands on the Arabs...But it did not work out...The
failure of the leading Jewish organizations to support with zeal this immigration
programme may have caused the President not to push forward with it at
that time...
"I talked to many people active in Jewish organizations. I suggested
the plan...I was amazed and even felt insulted when active Jewish leaders
decried, sneered, and then attacked me as if I were a traitor...I think
I know the reason for much of the opposition. There is a deep, genuine,
often fanatical emotional vested interest in putting over the Palestinian
movement [Zionism]. Men like Ben Hecht are little concerned about human
blood if it is not their own." Jewish attorney and friend of President
Roosevelt, Morris Ernst, "So Far, So Good."
Victimology
"Jewish proponents of the 'victim' card are aware not only of its
social effectiveness but of its usefulness as a means of insuring Jewish
solidarity and, hence, survival. If we were forever hated by all and are
doomed to be forever hated by all, then we'd best stick together and make
the best of it...Personally, I have never found this view of the eternally-hating
gentile to have any resemblance with reality. It seems a myth, pure and
simple, and an ugly one at that.
"Is it a good means of social control? Perhaps, but at what cost?
It strips the faith and history of Jew and gentile alike of all but their
months of antagonism. It wallows in evil imagery and postulates a forever
morally superior Jew, victimized by the forever morally inferior 'goy'..I
have spent most of my adult life among Hasidic Jews, almost all of whom
were Holocaust survivors, and I've heard almost nothing of the of the relentless
harping on victimology and our need to forever memorialize it...(Victimology)
allows Jews to bypass their own faith and offers the national allegiance
of Holocaust/Israel in its place." Rabbi Mayer Schiller, quoted
in "Issues of the American Council for Judaism," Summer 1998.